<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Writing on John-Daniel Trask</title>
		<link>https://jdtrask.com/post/index.html</link>
		<description>Recent content in Writing on John-Daniel Trask</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-NZ</language>
		
		
		
			<copyright>© John-Daniel Trask</copyright>
		
		
			<atom:link href="https://jdtrask.com/post/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>How businesses should think about AI adoption</title>
				<link>https://jdtrask.com/post/how-businesses-should-think-about-ai-adoption.html</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://jdtrask.com/post/how-businesses-should-think-about-ai-adoption.html</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;AI adoption is often framed as a technology decision: choose a model, buy some licences, connect a few systems, and wait for productivity to improve. That framing is convenient, but it misses the hard part.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Adopting AI is an operating-model decision. It changes how work moves through a business, where judgement is applied, how quality is checked, and what people are able to accomplish. The technology matters, but the value comes from redesigning the work around it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
